Turning $1M Into $1B+: A Masterclass From The Indian Warren Buffett | Mohnish Pabrai Interview

Investing, Buffett, Munger, and Entrepreneurial Bets - May 17, 2024 (11 months ago) • 02:01:16

This My First Million podcast episode features Shaan Puri interviewing Mohnish Pabrai, a billionaire investor often called "the Indian Warren Buffett." Pabrai details his journey into investing, emphasizing the importance of an entrepreneurial mindset and early specialization. He shares valuable insights gleaned from his interactions with Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger, highlighting the significance of patience, inactivity, and recognizing asymmetric opportunities in investing.

Early Specialization and the Entrepreneurial Brain: Pabrai discusses how the brain develops specialized skills between the ages of 11 and 20, using Warren Buffett's childhood businesses as examples. He argues that early entrepreneurial experiences are crucial for developing the skills needed for successful investing.
Pabrai's Path to Investing: Pabrai recounts his career progression, starting with an engineering background and transitioning to international marketing. He explains how his early exposure to business through his father's entrepreneurial ventures and his own IT services company prepared him for a career in investing.
The Patel Motel Empire: Pabrai shares the story of how Ugandan-Indian refugees, the Patels, came to dominate the American motel industry. He attributes their success to their low-cost operating model and strong community support, highlighting the advantage of being a low-cost producer.
Meeting Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger: Pabrai describes how he won a charity lunch with Warren Buffett and subsequently developed a close friendship with Charlie Munger. He emphasizes the lessons he learned from them, particularly about judging people and the importance of associating with exceptional individuals.
Investing Philosophies: Pabrai explains his "heads I win, tails I don't lose much" philosophy, using his investment in Ipsco as an example of an asymmetric opportunity. He also discusses the importance of patience and inactivity in investing, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's low hit rate.
Indexing vs. Active Investing: Pabrai recommends index fund investing for most people but suggests that those with the talent and patience to evaluate businesses and identify undervalued opportunities can benefit from active investing.
Bitcoin and Capital Allocation: Pabrai expresses skepticism about Bitcoin due to its lack of intrinsic value. He also analyzes the capital allocation strategies of companies like Meta and Tesla, praising Mark Zuckerberg's shift towards cost-cutting and Elon Musk's exceptional capital allocation skills.
Lessons from Charlie Munger: Pabrai concludes by sharing his favorite lesson from Charlie Munger: "I tried to be useful." He reflects on Munger's selfless nature and his commitment to helping others, even in the face of personal challenges.

Transcript:

Start Time	Speaker	Text
00:00	Mohnish Pabrai	An idea is like an asshole; everyone has one. Okay, ideas don't mean anything.
00:05	Shaan Puri	This guy is known as the Indian Warren Buffett. He's billionaire investor Monish Pabrai. Last month, I went to his house and asked him to teach me everything he knows about investing. "How did you make your money?"
00:16	Mohnish Pabrai	After taxes and everything, I got $1,000,000. For the first time, I had money in the bank. That million became worth $13,000,000, and I said, "Wow, well done, Monash!" They got 70% a year compounded.
00:33	Shaan Puri	How the hell were you getting these returns?
00:35	Mohnish Pabrai	I'm always looking at what is hated and unloved. The key to moving the needle is inactivity.
00:42	Shaan Puri	I've met and become friends with Charlie Munger and Warren Buffett. Good afternoon, Mr. Buffett, and good afternoon, Mr. Munger. My name is Monesh Pabrai. How does that happen?
00:52	Mohnish Pabrai	It shouldn't happen. When I look at a CEO, I always try to find out, "Did they run a lemonade stand when they were 12?" Because if they didn't run a lemonade stand at that age, they're not going to be that great at business at 30. How stupid can you be? If you know the big picture, you can change the big picture. The most important thing in life is: are you...?
01:16	Shaan Puri	Are you a fan of Bitcoin? Are you a believer?
01:18	Mohnish Pabrai	If you put a gun to my head, I would say...
01:20	Shaan Puri	What do you think about Elon Musk?
01:21	Mohnish Pabrai	Elon is not human.
01:22	Shaan Puri	If I said, "What's the number one trait that makes a great investor?" what comes to mind? Alright, welcome. Good morning.
01:40	Mohnish Pabrai	Great to be here, Sean.
01:41	Shaan Puri	You are a great investor, but you started as a businessman. I'm a businessman trying to become a great investor. How do those two relate?
01:49	Mohnish Pabrai	In our brains, we actually use the exact same part of the brain in both activities. Warren Buffett has a great quote: "I'm a better investor because I'm a businessman, and I'm a better businessman because I'm an investor." In his case, a lot of people don't know, but Warren had done a lot of different businesses in various areas before he was 17. He started when he was, I think, 5 or 6 years old. His very first business was buying cokes from his grandfather's store at a nickel a piece and then selling them at a dime a piece.
02:35	Shaan Puri	Right. Buy wholesale, sell retail.
02:37	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, so that was one of his first ones. One of the things that a lot of people don't understand about the way our brains work is that the human brain, when we are born, is the most underdeveloped organ. The birth canal is not wide enough, so for the first five years of life, the brain is the fastest growing organ that we have as humans. The neuron connections are growing at an exponential rate. From the age of about 11 to about 20, that window is when the brain is set up to specialize, and the neuron connections get cut. They actually go down quite a bit, but the brain allocates areas to hone in and specialize. So, you know, if you think of someone like Michelangelo, Bill Gates, or even Warren Buffett, these guys started specializing at 10 or 11. If you start writing code at the age of 10 or 11, for example, like Bill Gates did, by the time he was 20, the expertise that he had would be unmatched by someone starting at 20, even at 50. So that 10-year window is a very critical period in human development, and unfortunately, our education system doesn't recognize that.
04:14	Shaan Puri	I'm sorry, but it seems that the transcription you provided is too brief to require any formatting or enhancements. It is already clear and concise. If you have a longer transcription or additional content, please share it, and I would be happy to assist!
04:18	Mohnish Pabrai	We hope there are some 11-year-olds listening, or we hope when you have kids...
04:22	Shaan Puri	Tell your kids, "Yeah."
04:23	Mohnish Pabrai	It's not all... the cake's not fully baked yet. So, I think the thing with Warren was that when he was about 10 or 11 years old, he was running a bunch of very interesting businesses.
04:36	Shaan Puri	What was he doing? I've never heard these, so yeah, I didn't know this backstory.
04:40	Mohnish Pabrai	One of his first businesses was when he used to go to this racetrack in Omaha called Aksarben, which is Nebraska spelled backwards. He used to publish racing tips called "Stable Boy Selections," basically telling you what horses to bet on. After all the races had been run, he'd collect all the discarded tickets on the ground. He would go home and carefully go through each one to see if some drunk had thrown out a winning ticket. He'd find a few, but he was too young to go to the window to collect because he was under 18. So, he would give them to his Aunt Alice, who would go and collect for him. Around the age of 14 or 15, he had a very good friend in high school named Don Danley. Danley was a tinkerer; he was very mechanically inclined. One time, Warren went to Don's home and saw that Don was working on a pinball machine in his garage. He asked Don what he was doing, and Don said, "Oh, I just bought this pinball machine that wasn't working. They gave it away; I paid like $15 for it, and I think I can get it working." Warren asked him how much it was going to cost, and Don replied, "It's going to cost like $3 in parts and maybe a couple of hours to get it working." Then Warren asked, "Can you find more machines like this that don't work?" Don said, "Oh yeah, there are a lot of machines you can buy that people don't want because they don't work." So, Don and Warren formed a company in their minds; they never actually incorporated anything. They called it the "Wilson Koina Operated Amusement Company." They went to barbershops in D.C. These two boys, kind of nerdy-looking 15-year-olds, went to the barber and said, "Look, we work for a Mr. Wilson." Mr. Wilson did not exist; he was a fictitious character. They continued, "Mr. Wilson has asked us to present you with a proposition: we can put a pinball machine in the barbershop, and we'll come by once a week. Whatever coins are in there, we'll split it 50/50 with you—half for you and half for Mr. Wilson." The barber said, "Yeah, put it in the corner." So, Warren got Danley busy fixing pinball machines, and the two of them would go on weekends to get barbershops.
07:13	Shaan Puri	They're making some money this week.
07:14	Mohnish Pabrai	And so, I think he had eventually something like 40 barbershops with these machines. Warren said that the first week he went back to the first barbershop, he thought he died and went to heaven. There was like $5 or $6 in there, and so their take was what, like, you know, $3 on $18 of capital in one week, right? And he just told Don, "Go as fast as you can."
07:43	Shaan Puri	Danley, what are you doing right?
07:44	Mohnish Pabrai	Now, yeah, exactly. Warren had all these different resistances. He was a senior partner, and whoever he was working with was a junior partner. One time, Danley showed him an ad for a Rolls Royce for sale for $300, but it didn't run. It was an old, beat-up Rolls. You know, people were giving away junk, right? He thought he could fix the Rolls, so they bought it for $300 and maybe another $50 in parts. Danley had it running, and then they spruced it up. They would rent it on weekends for $100 to weddings. During the weekdays, the two of them would go to high school in the Rolls. So, what happened is, Warren didn't know this, but he was specializing in figuring out business during that window of time, from ages 11 to 20. By the time he was 18 or 19—I think he went to college when he was 17—he had $15,000. He told his dad, "I'm going to pay for my college myself." He also told his dad, "I don't need an inheritance. Whatever money there is, leave it to my two sisters."
09:02	Shaan Puri	Right.
09:03	Mohnish Pabrai	I'm good.
09:04	Shaan Puri	And $15,000 back then is a lot, you know, in today's dollars.
09:08	Mohnish Pabrai	About 10 to 1.
09:09	Shaan Puri	$150.17 a year old.
09:11	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, think about a 17-year-old with $150,000, right? At that time, college was cheap.
09:15	Shaan Puri	You know.
09:15	Mohnish Pabrai	And the other thing is that he got interested in investing. His dad was a stockbroker, so he used to go to his dad's office on the weekends. He says that at the age of 11, he bought his first stock and remarked, "I was wasting my time till then." However, he didn't really have an investing philosophy. At 19, he read The Intelligent Investor by Ben Graham, and that was transformational for him. He thought Ben Graham was this guy who had died and passed away, but then he discovered that Ben Graham was teaching at Columbia; he was a professor there. So, when he finished his undergraduate studies, he applied to Columbia to go to business school so he could learn directly from Graham. He joined Columbia's MBA program; he must have been around 20 or something.
10:11	Shaan Puri	Hey, real quick. As you know, we're big on ideas here. We love bringing new ideas—business ideas, brainstorming ideas—for the podcast. Well, a lot of people ask, "What do you do with all those ideas? Can we go find them? Is there a list somewhere?" The great people at HubSpot have put together a business ideas database. It's totally free! If you just click the link in the description below, you can go download a collection of over 50 business ideas that are from the archive, listed out for you and curated. So, what are you waiting for? Go download it! It's free. Check it out; it's in the description below. Alright, back to the show.
10:39	Mohnish Pabrai	And then, of course, after that, Graham hired him.
10:44	Shaan Puri	And isn't there some story where he tells Graham, "I'll work for you for free," and Ben Graham says, "Your price is too high"? That's correct. So we still ended up.
10:54	Mohnish Pabrai	Convincing him somehow... So actually, Graham, at that time, Jews were very heavily discriminated against. There was a lot of anti-Semitism on Wall Street. So, Ben Graham, who was Jewish, wanted to give the few jobs that he had to Jewish kids and young Jewish people because they just weren't bringing opportunities. He basically told Warren, "Look, I gotta take care of the community."
11:15	Shaan Puri	Right.
11:15	Mohnish Pabrai	But then Warren went back to Omaha, and about a few months after that, Graham called him and said, "If you want to come to New York, I got something for you." Warren never asked him what the salary was or what the position was; he just took the next train to New York with his wife. His experience as a businessman was very lucky. It got seared in that window of time. Both Warren and Charlie can crack businesses and business models really fast. So when we start a business, we will spend maybe 3, 4, or 5% of our time figuring out the strategy—what's going to be the product, service, pricing, and how we're going to make it work, along with all the different plans. Then, 95 to 97% is all the blocking and tackling to make it happen.
12:09	Shaan Puri	Right, it's Danley fixing machines.
12:11	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, exactly. In the case of investing, we use the same brain cells that we use in that 3 to 5% of the time. Basically, one of the things that attracted me to investing was that this 3% becomes 80%. Mhm. We don't need a daily grind; we've got public companies and all of that. We just have to pick which businesses we want to own partially and which ones we want to ride. I always find it strange when I run into investors who haven't been entrepreneurs because I think they're missing a very key part. On the other hand, I find that entrepreneurs are very naturally already set up to be great investors if they make a couple of tweaks. What ends up happening is that we don't see a lot of entrepreneurs becoming investors, and we also see a lot of investors who haven't built businesses or met payroll. Both have flaws. So, if you had the good fortune of having the entrepreneurial experience, then I think looking at the Buffett-Munger frameworks makes for a very easy transition.
13:38	Shaan Puri	It's probably also easier to go from business to investor than to be an investor for a long time and then suddenly try to be an entrepreneur.
13:44	Mohnish Pabrai	Well, investor to business, the problem is the window is closed, right? So you'd be at a disadvantage to start with. But yeah, the earlier you start on both endeavors...
13:55	Shaan Puri	Right.
13:56	Mohnish Pabrai	The better off you are.
13:57	Shaan Puri	There's a great... I don't know if you've seen this, but I didn't know. Like, I always heard, "Okay, Warren and Charlie, great investors." I read the shareholder letters, and the shareholder letters are often amazing, but they're very high level and philosophical in a way. Then I saw this letter of Warren writing to, I think, the CEO of See's Candy. I don't know if you've seen this, but it's a letter, and I expected it to be very, again, philosophical and amusing. Instead, he's like brass tacks right away. He's like, "I went to the store and I have a few ideas for you." It's very operational and tactical. I noticed this price, I noticed this, and I was like, "Oh, he's a businessman." Like, today we only think of him as one bucket, but actually, he's got both gears.
14:45	Mohnish Pabrai	See's is a wonderful, wonderful business. It taught them a lot. It taught them more than they ever thought they'd learn from a "stupid" candy business.
14:54	Shaan Puri	Right.
14:54	Mohnish Pabrai	But one of the things Warren did when he first bought Cies is he told the CEO, "Listen, you’ve got free rein. Run the business like you’ve been running it and so on and so forth. But on December 26th, I’m going to set the prices for the next year."
15:11	Shaan Puri	Okay.
15:12	Mohnish Pabrai	Okay, so he would sit down with the entire Sea's price list and he would bump all the prices by 10 or 15%. Inflation might have been 3%, right? So he would raise prices significantly above inflation, and what he would observe is that volumes went up. Then, the year after that, he'd again bump it by another 10 or 12%, and volume still went up. Both he and Charlie were amazed that you could have a business where you're continuously raising prices significantly above the rate of inflation and there's no resistance from the customer base to accepting those prices. That's what gave them a huge lesson in brands. You know, he was a dyed-in-the-wool, hardcore, deep value investor. It was really hard for them; they paid three times book value for Sea's. They were choking almost when they paid that amount. So, I think they bought Sea's for like $25,000,000. Looking back, they could have paid $200,000,000 and it would have...
16:25	Shaan Puri	It still would have been a good deal.
16:26	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, and C's has sent dividends to Berkshire in the billions. I mean, it's been about 50 years since the purchase, and $1,000,000,000 have flowed from C's to Berkshire, which has then been used to buy a whole plethora of other businesses. If you look at their purchase of Coke, for example, they put a quarter of the entire book value of Berkshire Hathaway into Coke in 1988. If they had not bought C's, they would have never bought Coke.
17:05	Shaan Puri	Right.
17:06	Mohnish Pabrai	So, the lessons that they learned about branding and the power of brands is what led to the Coke investment, which was a much bigger home run. They've made many more brand investments since then.
17:18	Shaan Puri	Half the portfolio is in Apple right now, right?
17:20	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, so one of them.
17:21	Shaan Puri	One of them.
17:21	Mohnish Pabrai	The best brands in the world... I think Warren understood this notion of consumer behavior and how powerful brands can be, and how powerful habits can be. And then he went from there. So, yeah, absolutely.
17:37	Shaan Puri	One of the interesting things about Seas is that it wasn't this fast grower. They bought it, and then its sales exploded. But what I think the beauty of Seas, if I remember correctly, is that there was no additional capital that had to go in. So, everything was just free cash flow coming out.
17:53	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, so, Seize is very much a California story, right? I mean, it was founded in California. Almost all the sales were in California. If you look at Seize from the time they bought it until today, about 50 years, the unit volume has gone up on average 2% a year. Okay, California's GDP, probably at least in the seventies, eighties, and nineties, was going up about at least 4 or 5% a year. So they were actually... and part of that might have been the price increases. Okay, but even with those heavy price increases, they still got the volume going up slightly.
18:34	Shaan Puri	Yeah.
18:34	Mohnish Pabrai	But when you overlay that, you know, you do 50 years of 10%. That's a very big number.
18:41	Shaan Puri	Right.
18:41	Mohnish Pabrai	Right, and so season is not cheap today. Warren was very excited about being the candy mogul of the world. They tried really hard to send C's everywhere. I mean, they would open a store in Chicago and then fall flat on their face. Then they'd open in Arizona and they'd fall flat on their face again. They repeatedly tried over and over again to broaden C's.
19:11	Shaan Puri	Right.
19:11	Mohnish Pabrai	And expand it. By and large, those efforts didn't work. Even today, the bulk of the volumes of See's is in California. So when the Coke investment came about, they discovered something very different than See's. They knew See's doesn't travel well, but they could look at more than a 100-year history of Coke and they knew Coke travels really well. There are two countries in the world where you can't get Coke: North Korea and Cuba. If they opened up to Coke in either of those two countries and Coke did not advertise at all, sales would take off. It's so embedded in pop culture. Even in countries and places where they've never done any branding before, people in Pakistan, India, or Bangladesh are having Indian food with a Coke. It's ubiquitous. That did not exist with See's Candy. It wasn't ubiquitous. Warren understood you can't consume infinite amounts of candy; there's an aftertaste. With Coke, you can actually consume a lot of it.
20:31	Shaan Puri	Right, there's no... what does he call it? Taste memory.
20:33	Mohnish Pabrai	There's no aftertaste.
20:34	Shaan Puri	Yeah, that's right.
20:36	Mohnish Pabrai	So, I think, like I said, they moved from being hardcore quantitative, deep value guys to actually understanding a lot of nuances of brands and consumer behavior. This was very fundamental to how and why Berkshire did so well.
20:54	Shaan Puri	So, you talked about specializing in that 11 to 20 years old-ish window. Yeah, today you've done phenomenally well. You've managed, I don't know, almost $1,000,000,000 or maybe more—who knows? A lot of money. And you've done incredibly well investing. Did you do that when you were 11 to 20, or were you a late bloomer?
21:17	Mohnish Pabrai	So, no, actually it was just dumb luck. A lot of things in my life have been dumb luck. My dad was a quintessential entrepreneur, and he was really good at it. You know, a great entrepreneur needs to be able to identify offering gaps—some product or service that ought to exist but doesn't. Like Starbucks before Starbucks or McDonald's before McDonald's, and so on, right? My dad was really good at figuring out that, "Oh, this product should be there but isn't." He was also really good at starting businesses from scratch. However, his downfall was that he was always very aggressive and over-leveraged. When the businesses were going well, he was literally taking every last dime of profit coming in and everything that he could borrow, just pouring it into growth as aggressively as possible. The negative side was that when the first headwind showed up, the businesses had no staying power, and they would run into trouble. My brother and I, I think after we were like maybe 9 or 10 years old, became his board of directors. I remember when I was about 10 or 11 years old, my dad, my brother, and I would sit down in the evening and figure out how to make the business survive for one more day. All the walls were caving in; everything was going bad, and there were a lot of moving parts. We would put our heads together and try to figure out how to make it last, right? Then we'd make it past one day, and the next night, the same thing all over again. So, I finished many MBAs before I was...
23:15	Shaan Puri	12
23:16	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, by 6... and I think at 15 or 16, I was... I don't know why my dad did it, but I'm really grateful he did. He used to take me on sales calls. You know, who takes a 15-year-old on a sales call? It just doesn't fit, but my dad didn't care. That was just incredible for me because I was getting to see... I finished high school in Dubai, so I was in Dubai from the age of 16 to actually 19. In that window of time, my dad had a gold jewelry business. We used to go... I used to go with him to these places. He was manufacturing gold jewelry and selling it to these retail merchants, right? So, he was going into cold calling.
24:01	Shaan Puri	Right.
24:01	Mohnish Pabrai	I'm observing him going into a jewelry store. He doesn't know them.
24:06	Shaan Puri	Were you a silent shadow, or did you have a role?
24:08	Mohnish Pabrai	No, no, I was... I was very.
24:09	Shaan Puri	Silent. Okay.
24:10	Mohnish Pabrai	But I was soaking it in. Sometimes, when he was traveling, my brother and I would run the business. There were all these goldsmiths, and we managed giving them the gold and taking the jewelry. So basically, I didn't realize it then, but when I went to college, I studied engineering. I then joined a telecom networking company as an R&D engineer. When we were working on these products, I'd ask my boss, "So what are you going to sell this for? Who's the customer? What kind of, like, what are you going to make on it?" My boss would tell me, "Those are all questions for marketing and sales. We don't need to care about that. Just design the product."
24:53	Shaan Puri	Right.
24:53	Mohnish Pabrai	He didn't know the answers.
24:54	Shaan Puri	Yeah, that's the poker tell.
24:57	Mohnish Pabrai	He didn't know the answers, and he didn't care. I found that all the people I worked with, the engineers, didn't care. I said, "How stupid can you be? You don't have the big picture." The big picture is interesting and exciting. If you know the big picture, you can change it. So, what I did after two and a half years with the nerds is I switched to international marketing. That was such a breath of fresh air; it was so great. My learning, again, skyrocketed. I had a big advantage because I had a very strong engineering background, but I also had all the background from my teen years. What I found is that I was able to connect with customers and figure out what they wanted and how to really get the order much better than guys 20 years more experienced than me. They hadn't had all these experiences, and they didn't think like an entrepreneur. It was just a small subset. Later in life, when I heard about Buffett for the first time, I found a lot of commonality. I mean, he had a very different experience in the sense that he was his own entrepreneur.
26:12	Shaan Puri	Right.
26:12	Mohnish Pabrai	But one of the things that's really important is that when I look at a CEO, I always try to find out: did they run a lemonade stand when they were 12? Because if they didn't run the lemonade stand when they were 12, they're not going to be that great at business at 30. Okay, the little itty bitty lemonade stand has a lot of lessons.
26:34	Shaan Puri	Right.
26:34	Mohnish Pabrai	And so I think when we have kids, it's really important in that window. They don't need to run lemonade stands, but they really need to be doing what's going to be their calling. I think that's the biggest responsibility of parents: they need to expose them to more of what they think their passion is.
26:59	Shaan Puri	You know, I've done maybe 500+ episodes now of this, and the podcast is named My First Million because when we first started, I was fascinated by the many different ways people became millionaires. I thought it was cool to hear the stories. That's how the podcast started. Along the way, I noticed three common things about what people were doing in their teens. I used to ask this question: "You’re amazing now, but if I met you when you were 14, what were you doing? Would I have known that you were going to go on to do interesting things?" Most people are very humble; they're like, "Oh, you wouldn't have known." But then when I ask, "What were you doing?" it's always something that no other 13 or 14-year-old is doing. It's like, "Oh yeah, I used to go to the shop and I found these CDs, Rosetta Stone, that I could sell for 3x on eBay, and I made an eBay account." Or, "I started buying shoes and flipping them." So it was always like eBay flipping or sneaker flipping, which is a super common one. Another one was competitive video games because a lot of the strategy, communication, collaboration, and extreme competitiveness gets built in there. There are a couple of others, but another one is a Mormon mission. Mormons would go and have to sell, you know, Jesus to a bunch of people, getting rejected a thousand times in two years. They become incredible salespeople. So you see these backgrounds where, oh, you were kind of forged at an early age to do this.
28:21	Mohnish Pabrai	Well, we have a common friend. You know Syed Balkhi, right? You interviewed him for your podcast. Syed was an entrepreneur at the age of 8 or 9, maybe even earlier than that.
28:34	Shaan Puri	Right.
28:35	Mohnish Pabrai	He was selling greeting cards. He was making and selling them on street corners.
28:39	Shaan Puri	Right.
28:40	Mohnish Pabrai	You know, by the time he was 11 or 12, I think he was writing code.
28:44	Shaan Puri	Make a website, you know?
28:45	Mohnish Pabrai	And went from there.
28:47	Shaan Puri	Right, you know, yeah. How did you make your money? Give me the highlights of your progression in terms of your own ability to generate money and then start to invest it.
28:55	Mohnish Pabrai	I actually never wanted to be an entrepreneur. I never wanted to start a business because I had seen so much turmoil and trauma in my childhood. I remember I was about 24 or 25 years old, and my dad was visiting me while I was living in Chicago. He told me, "It's time to quit and start your own business." I responded, "Have you forgotten my childhood and all the ups and downs?" My dad just said, "Oh, that's what makes life great."
29:34	Shaan Puri	Right.
29:34	Mohnish Pabrai	But he said, "Look, the company you're in, the business I work for, had 2,000 people. You're such a tiny cog in such a big wheel. You could drop dead tomorrow, and they won't even miss you. Okay? You don't matter." What you really want to be doing is figuring out something where there's an offering gap and go for it, right? I was actually getting a little bit frustrated at work because the company had been growing, and it was getting more and more bureaucratic. So, I started to think about what might be possible. I didn't have any money, you know? Basically, I was 24 or 25. What I did was come up with some IT services offerings that I thought would be pretty unique because, at that time, client-server computing was just getting going in the early nineties. I had about $30,000 in my 401(k), and I said, "Okay, we'll worry about retirement later," and I pulled that out.
30:44	Shaan Puri	Nice.
30:45	Mohnish Pabrai	And I applied for every credit card I could get my hands on. I had $70,000 available to me in different credit limits on credit cards. So I said, "Okay, we've got up to $100,000 that we can play with." The third thing that I did is I basically did both. I was going to my job and I had started my company at the same time. What I would do is, from 6 to 9 in the morning, I'd work on my business, and then from 6 PM to midnight, I'd work on my business again, including weekends. But somebody was paying the rent; I still had a paycheck and all that. I said, "Okay, once we have enough revenue, clients, and profit, I can quit." I always tell people that if you think about it, there are 168 hours in a week. Your employer needs you for 40. If you live close to work or work remotely, the commute time is not that much. Even if you take out time for eating, sleeping, and everything else, you have at least another 40 to 50 hours that you can engage in something other than work. I used to always get great reviews when I was starting my business. I said, "Okay, look, the plan is to not get fired. The plan is not to be Employee of the Year."
32:18	Shaan Puri	I don't need to overshoot.
32:19	Mohnish Pabrai	So, I said, "I'm going to give them just enough so I'm just above firing level," right? You know, where it's not so bad that they call me in and terminate me. I need to be above that. Okay, and I did this over 9 months. Then I had clients, revenue, and all that. I went into my boss and his boss, and I resigned. They said, "You know, Monesh, we really couldn't figure out the last 9 months. Like, you checked out." I said, "Exactly. My goal was to just do enough so I didn't get fired." But she said, "Yeah, we saw a big drop in the old Monesh and the new Monesh. We talked about it, and we actually said it's not so bad that we would fire him, but there's something off."
33:07	Shaan Puri	Right, we...
33:08	Mohnish Pabrai	Couldn't we figure it out, right? So, I explained to them that I was going into my own business, which was not competitive with theirs. They said, "Look, when your business fails—not if your business fails, but when it fails—you can come back. We're going to give you more money, we're going to promote you, and you're going to do great." I said, "You know, my plan was that if I failed in my business, I could look for a job. I have my degree, and I could apply for personal bankruptcy, clean everything off, and start over." I thought, "This is even better! I don't have to look for a job; I get more money!" I actually felt like... you know, people think there's a false mental model. People think entrepreneurs take risks. Entrepreneurs do not take risks; they do everything in their power to minimize risk. If you think about Buffett's pinball machine business, what was the risk those two 14-year-olds took? Nothing! It was $15 in a pinball machine, which they could use themselves, right?
34:19	Shaan Puri	Worst case.
34:20	Mohnish Pabrai	Scenario: $3. $3 in parts. The second pinball machine will only be bought when the first one is already producing cash.
34:28	Shaan Puri	Right.
34:28	Mohnish Pabrai	Right, and the third one after the second one. So basically, there's no risk. If it fails, they sell those machines for more than they bought them.
34:37	Shaan Puri	Entrepreneurs are actually great risk reducers. They start with something that seems risky, but...
34:42	Mohnish Pabrai	So, that's the other thing that is a commonality between entrepreneurs and value investors, which is why the same brain cells get used. Both are trying to minimize risk. You know, we as value investors want to go low risk, high return, and great entrepreneurs are doing exactly that. They're going low risk, high return. Nobody is doing high risk, high return. If you look at the United States, probably around 1,000,000 businesses, more than 1,000,000 businesses a year get formed. Venture-backed businesses are much less than even 1% of that pie. In most years, it's less than 1/10 of 1%. So, if there was no venture capital and no venture-backed businesses, it would make no difference to the landscape. We'd still have the 1,000,000 businesses being formed. Venture-backed businesses are a different animal because they are high risk, high return. What the VC wants you to do is this: the VC has 10 bets. He doesn't care whether your bet works or not; he just wants one of those 10 to work. So, he wants you to step on the gas as aggressively as possible. If you blow up, you blow up. When you're an entrepreneur who's not venture-backed, that is not how you go. You don't just put your foot on the gas; you're very careful about downside protection. So, what happened even...
36:11	Shaan Puri	Some of the big entrepreneurs include Richard Branson.
36:14	Mohnish Pabrai	Oh yeah.
36:15	Shaan Puri	I think people see him as this free, you know, risk-taker, reckless sort of guy. But you've pointed out that that's not true about Richard Branson in this case.
36:24	Mohnish Pabrai	One of those stories I love about Branson is when he had the idea to start Virgin Atlantic Airline. Right, the minimum that you need to start transatlantic service is a Boeing 747, okay? A couple of $100,000,000, right? Branson got Virgin Atlantic off the ground with no money. So what he did is he called directory assistance in the United States, 555-1212, in Seattle, 206-555-1212. He asked for the number for Boeing. Okay, he gets the number for Boeing, calls the main switchboard, and says, "I'd like to lease a 747 that you guys might have hanging around that you're not using." They hung up on him.
37:15	Shaan Puri	Right.
37:16	Mohnish Pabrai	Okay, he keeps calling them, and finally, the lady at the switchboard says, "Let me transfer you to someone who can get rid of you properly." So, she transferred him to someone who's head of commercial sales. This guy tells him, "Listen, Mister Branson, in every country we have one customer, and you are not the customer. In the UK, it's British Airways, and therefore, there's nothing to talk about." So Richard tells them, "Listen, I agree with you, that's fine, but just humor me for a second. Do you have an old Boeing 747 lying around that you're not using?" He says, "Yeah, actually, we do." Richard continues, "If one of your customers, like the one in the UK, called you—like British Airways—and they wanted a plane, what would you lease it for?" The guy responds, "Well, I really don't need to have this conversation, but we would lease it for about $200,000 a month." Okay, $200,000 or $300,000 a month. Branson was able to convince Boeing to lease him that 747 because it was sitting and doing nothing. Then, when he set up Virgin Atlantic, he said, "You get paid for all the future flights in advance because people buy tickets." So, the plane's going to fly in April, but people already bought tickets in February.
38:43	Shaan Puri	Right, so you...
38:43	Mohnish Pabrai	Say, I got cash coming in 2 months, 3 months before the plane's gonna fly. I'm gonna pay for the fuel 30 days after that plane lands. Okay, so he had negative working capital and the lease payment is also in arrears, right? So basically, he was able to get Virgin Atlantic off the ground with $0 equity. Now, the way I look at it is that if you can start an airline with no money, you can start any business with no money, right? Okay, you just have to replace capital with creative thinking.
39:21	Shaan Puri	Right. How is it possible that 0.1% of the population owns almost 70% of all the motels in America? I think this is an incredible story. Can you explain how that is possible?
39:32	Mohnish Pabrai	In the early seventies, a dictator came to power in Uganda: Idi Amin. Idi Amin noticed that in Uganda, most of the businesses were controlled by East Asians, specifically Indians, known as "pattels." They controlled about 80% of the economy. These pattels had come to Uganda; they were brought there about 100 years ago to work on the railroad, almost as slaves. However, because they were natural entrepreneurs, they transitioned from railroad builders to eventually owning and controlling the entire economy. Amin was upset about this. He declared, "Africa is for Africans," and stated that these pattels were not Africans. Despite the fact that these pattels had been in Uganda for three or four generations and were Ugandan citizens—born and raised—he nationalized all their businesses and expelled them from the country.
40:40	Shaan Puri	Which just means they took their businesses, right?
40:42	Mohnish Pabrai	He just took them. Yeah, he basically confiscated all—not their businesses, homes, everything. He confiscated all the assets and told them, "You got 90 days to leave the country."
40:50	Shaan Puri	Wow.
40:50	Mohnish Pabrai	So, these Patels in Uganda were stateless. You're being thrown out; you know, you're sitting in another country, and that country is throwing you out. They lost all their money. They were able to convert a very small sliver of their assets into gold. The United States took some Patels as refugees. The UK took them, Canada took them, but India surprisingly refused to take the Patels. They refused to recognize that the Patels had any right to return to India because they said, "You haven't been here for a hundred years." At that time, India was dealing with the Bangladesh refugee crisis, so it couldn't handle anything more. However, a small number of Patels, a few thousand of them, came into the United States in the early '70s as refugees. They didn't have skills that would allow them to get great jobs. They spoke English with a funny accent. They realized that if they bought a really small motel—10, 12, or 14 rooms—the family could live in one or two rooms. Motels are labor-intensive.
42:09	Shaan Puri	Right.
42:10	Mohnish Pabrai	The family can do all the work, you know? It's a...
42:12	Shaan Puri	Job and a house together.
42:13	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, so basically cooking, cleaning, front desk, and laundry. What they started doing is they would buy these motels, fire all the staff, and move into two of the rooms. Because they had no costs, they were able to charge nightly rates that were lower than all the neighboring motels. What would happen is that the Patel-owned motel would be running at 100% occupancy, while the other motels couldn't match that rate because they'd lose money.
42:48	Shaan Puri	Right.
42:49	Mohnish Pabrai	Right, because they had.
42:50	Shaan Puri	Staff and...
42:51	Mohnish Pabrai	Workers' comp and staff and all that stuff, right? What the Patels started to do— and the Patels are very frugal. They basically were vegetarians at that time. In the U.S., if you're vegetarian, you really had a hard time; you couldn't really eat out anywhere. So, they were forced to just cook for themselves, which was cheap. There wasn't much of a grocery bill. What they started doing is, as their nephew came of age, for example, they would help him out to buy his own motel. Then the nephew would get that going, and then the next one, and the next one. You run this for 50 years, and you end up with 70% of the motels in the country under Patel ownership. Not only that, they've actually gone upmarket now. So, a lot of the Hiltons, Marriotts, Westins—if you really look, you'll find it's under Patel ownership. Same math. They are always very good operators. Then they went into 7-Eleven, laundromats, Dunkin' Donuts, all of it. You name it. But the bottom line was that these were entrepreneurs that were low-cost producers. Low-cost producers have an inherent advantage. I remember when I first met Charlie; he had read my book, and we were discussing the Patels. He said, "Yeah, you know, I got some friends in the motel business. I just tell them, don't ever, ever try to compete with the Patels. If you ever find yourself in competition with the Patels, just find another game to play. Just move on; it's not worth it."
44:39	Shaan Puri	So, you said you met Charlie. That's gotta be kind of a surreal thing for you—to have met and become friends with Charlie Munger and Warren Buffett. How does that happen? How does that come about?
44:51	Mohnish Pabrai	It shouldn't happen, you know? I was this squandie kid who grew up in the suburbs of Mumbai. I accidentally heard of Warren Buffett in the mid-nineties. It was a big moment for me. At that time, I was lucky; the first couple of biographies on him had come out. What I realized is that when I read about how Warren was investing, I said, "All these models are the same models that an entrepreneur uses." It's exactly what I was saying: that you can be a better businessman because I'm an entrepreneur and vice versa. So I said, you know, the big advantage he seems to have is that 4% of time on strategy is 80% of time for him. Even in the business I had created, the IT business which had grown and scaled, I always enjoyed the 4% more. I was the...
45:49	Shaan Puri	Strategy: the face to face.
45:50	Mohnish Pabrai	Face value, I was happy doing sales calls and building teams. That was great. Once I said, "Wow, if I go into investing, it would be 80% of my time because there's no blocking and tackling; someone else is doing that." For me, that was a big moment that I should switch. I was lucky in the mid-nineties when someone bought a small portion of my business. After taxes and everything, I got $1,000,000, and for the first time, I had money in the bank. I didn't really need the million, so I said, "Okay, what we're going to do is take this million, we're going to invest in the public markets, and we're going to find out if we can actually do this." You know, an idea is like an asshole; everyone has one. Ideas don't mean anything, right? You really have to execute. It's really execution on the idea that has value. Entrepreneurs get kind of hung up on, "Oh, I need to get a patent," and all that. One of the things you have to understand is you can go to your most direct competitors, tell them all your trade secrets, and they will listen to you really carefully, but they will not change behavior. So you don't need patents for anything. Ideas don't mean anything; it's really the execution. So basically, I said, "Okay, let's take the million, let's start investing it, and let's figure out what happens." I was surprised; we did really well. I think that from like 1995 to 2000, a five-year period...
47:28	Mohnish Pabrai	That million became what? $13,000,000. I said, "Wow, well done, Monish!" So, they got 70% a year compounded. I was doing investing part-time while I was running my IT business. I was much more interested in the investing side, losing interest on the business side. Then, in 1999, I didn't even feel like going into work. I said, "This is... I just want to focus on investing." I made a couple of big changes then. I looked for and found a CEO to run my company. Basically, $13,000,000 to $14,000,000 felt like enough to retire and do nothing. I could do investing full-time. My plan was, okay, someone can run the business. Whatever's value is there is there; it doesn't matter. I can go off and just do investing full-time. I had a few friends who I used to just give stock tips to. In the mid-nineties, I'd find some company and make the investment. After that, I didn't care who bought the stock. I mean, I already bought it, right? So, I'd tell my friends, "Hey, you know, I found this company. You ought to see if you want to take a flyer on it and buy it." They did really well on the stock tips. Some guys were worth like $5,000,000, and they would put $10,000 into what I told them, and they would triple their money. It wouldn't make any difference, right? So, a bunch of these friends came to me and said, "Look, we don't like this randomness of these stock tips. We don't see you sometimes, and you may have sold. We don't know. We want you to manage some money for us." They were proposing giving me $100,000 each, which would total $1,000,000. I said, "Okay, I'll do it." I thought of it as a hobby; I didn't even think of it as a fund. But I wanted to do it in a format that worked for me. I loved the Buffett partnerships where he didn't charge management fees; he only charged performance fees.
49:41	Shaan Puri	So, what's a normal structure? And then what did Warren do?
49:44	Mohnish Pabrai	So, a normal hedge fund would be a 2 and 20 structure. They would take 2% of assets as the management fee for breathing.
49:52	Shaan Puri	Every year.
49:52	Mohnish Pabrai	Every year.
49:53	Shaan Puri	Yeah.
49:53	Mohnish Pabrai	And then 20% of the profits, right? So if a hedge fund, for example, has $1,000,000,000 under management, the general partners would take $20,000,000 a year.
50:06	Shaan Puri	For breathing.
50:07	Mohnish Pabrai	For breathing, if it went up 10%, they would make $100,000,000. For example, on the billion, they'd take another $20,000,000 from that. So basically, what would happen is the investor who put up the money on a 10% return gets a 6% return, right below the S&P, because of all these frictional costs. Warren Buffett had run his partnership by saying that there’s no management fee. The first 6% returns go to you, and above that, I’ll take one-fourth and you take three-fourths. In the same situation, if the fund is up 10%, in Buffett's case, the first $60,000,000 goes to the investors, and the remaining $40,000,000 is split. So it becomes $10,000,000 to him and $30,000,000 to the investors. It’s a better structure; it’s basically half the fee, and you’re paying for performance. If he’s not up that much, you don’t pay anything. I like that structure, and so I told them I want to set up a fund that is all legal, and we will do it with that structure. They really didn’t care what structure it was. So Pabrai Funds really started in '99 as a hobby with me and my buddies. I had $13,000,000 on the side, which was my main focus, and I said, “Yeah, there’s another $1,000,000 here. It’s okay if I find something and buy for both; it makes no difference.” About a year after that, there was about $2.5 million. We were up like 70% the first year, and some more money had come in. I said, “You know, why do I treat the fund like a stepchild? Why don’t I think of it like a real business? Why don’t I basically grow and scale it like a real business?” So I started to do that, and Pabrai Funds had a very good run for the first 8 or 9 years. I think we were doing like mid-30s a year on average, with no down years. The assets grew; we were at about, I think, in 2007, we were at about $600,000,000 in assets under management, and I had made a lot of money, you know, from the fees and the compounding and all of that.
52:24	Shaan Puri	So, in like a 10-year period, you turned the $1,000,000 of managed money into about $600,000,000 of assets under management, including new money coming in.
52:32	Mohnish Pabrai	From... yeah, it wasn't all... it wasn't just organic. But the original money had almost tripled.
52:38	Shaan Puri	Right.
52:38	Mohnish Pabrai	You know, it tripled or quadrupled in that.
52:40	Shaan Puri	I had asked you yesterday when we were hanging out. I said, you know, there are really two questions when you hear this story. Number one: How the hell were you getting these returns? What did you know about investment? What was that part? But the second part is, what did you do on the fundraising side? How did you get so much more money to come through the door? You had a great line about that—about how you get more money to come through the door because you didn't strike me as a guy who wanted to be out there fundraising, knocking on doors, and trying to raise funds. So, how does it happen?
53:07	Mohnish Pabrai	Buffett has a great, great quote. He says that if you are in a rowboat in the middle of the Atlantic, they will swim to you in shark-infested waters to invest with you if you have beaten the market. Right? They will find you. He says you could be a leper and they will invest with you.
53:27	Shaan Puri	That's what happened.
53:28	Mohnish Pabrai	And also, one of the things that was very difficult for me was that the SEC had a lot of rules and laws around hedge funds. One of those is you cannot solicit to the general public. Right? So when I was running my IT business, I could call on any CIO and say, "Hey, would you like to use our services?" I could literally call anyone out of the phone book. However, when you're running a fund, you can't just get a list of dentists in North Carolina and pound them. That's not legal. The SEC said you can only talk to people you know. I thought, "Okay, I know very few people." I was going to run out of my Rolodex in like 5 minutes. So what I did was start to meet my investors once a year for an annual meeting where I would give them their results and take their questions and all of that. I told them, "Listen, there is one reason and one reason alone you were put on planet Earth, and that is to bring assets to Pabrai Funds." Okay? Humans are always looking for a calling. They are looking for some cult leader to follow and be part of a cult.
54:45	Shaan Puri	So, you gave them one? So, yeah, you know they...
54:47	Mohnish Pabrai	Were they wandering in the wilderness? They needed purpose. Okay, so I said, "Here's what you need to do. You need to go talk to your friends and family because I can't talk to them. The SEC won't let me talk to them. You can talk to them. You tell them about me, and you tell them to contact me. Once they contact me, I can engage with them." So go out and spread the word. And send me more of your assets too. Okay, so basically, like I said, I started with $1,000,000. A year later, it's $2,500,000. Two years later, it's $10,000,000, and it's growing. You know, part of it was that the annual returns are adding, but part of it was that I had 8 investors when I started. A year later, they were 17, and two years later, they were 25. So now I had an audience of 25 to proselytize and spread the word, you know? And of course, the results. Now, the other thing that was happening is that when I started the funds in 1999, we were 9 months away from the biggest bubble about to burst that had happened in decades: the dot-com bubble. Right? I was able to see the bubble not very much in advance of the rest of the world, maybe just 2 or 3 months ahead. I knew the internet was transformational, but I also knew that the euphoria was too much. You know, we had Pets.com trading at multibillion-dollar valuations with no revenues.
56:26	Shaan Puri	Right.
56:27	Mohnish Pabrai	I mean, it was just common to have a lot of companies. People were counting eyeballs; they weren't counting dollars. They weren't looking at net income, and they weren't even looking at revenue. They were just looking at eyeballs. So, I said, "Okay, this is bad news. It will blow up at some point. The bubble's gonna burst." I didn't know when, but I had always been a tech investor from the mid-nineties, and I'd done really well. Tech had a great run from 1995 to 2000; it had just done really well, and I'd ridden that coattail. But what I did in '99, when the fund started and also with my own capital, is I did a 180. I switched completely to classic Ben Graham deep value, you know, what Buffett had started doing in the fifties. One of the things that was happening in the equity markets at that time was that the day the Nasdaq peaked, I think it was March 8th or March 9th, 2000, was the day that Berkshire hit a multi-year low. Literally, people were pulling money out of their Berkshire stock and buying Pets.com, right? And then that goes to zero eventually. So, I said, "Okay, basically, there are a lot of basic businesses that have become really cheap because nobody was interested." I was buying funeral homes at two times earnings and buying steel companies at three times earnings. So, a lot of basic businesses, which are very predictable and doing well, were trading really cheap.
58:01	Shaan Puri	Right.
58:02	Mohnish Pabrai	And so, Pabrai Funds did really well. In fact, the Nasdaq imploded. Basically, it hit 5,000 in March 2000. By the time it bottomed out in the next 2 or 3 years, it was at 1,200—a 75% drop. You know, the Dow and the S&P didn't go down as much, but they also went down a lot. It was traumatic for investors, but it was great for me. So, it was very easy for me to talk to my investors because I was the only guy making money for them. If they had like 5 accounts, they just moved it all to me because everything else was going down.
58:46	Shaan Puri	Everything else was red.
58:48	Mohnish Pabrai	And so that's how we got going. In 2007, I think my net worth at that time was around $84,000,000. Warren had been running these charity lunch auctions where, once a year, you could bid on eBay to have lunch with Warren Buffett. The money would go to the Glide Foundation, which was doing, you know, feeding the homeless and all that in San Francisco. I said, "You know, I am using this guy's intellectual property. I'm making all this money off him, and I really have a big tuition bill I need to pay." So I thought the lunch was a great way to do that. I said I could bid for the lunch, meet Warren, and thank him in person, and it goes to a cause that he supports. So I thought about it. Okay, $84,000,000—what's an appropriate tuition bill? I said $2,000,000 is good. I think if I gave him $2,000,000, I'd feel good about that, right? So I decided in 2007 I was going to bid for that lunch. I decided I would go up to $2,000,000, and you can bring up to seven other people to that lunch. I was going to take my family, but there were still a couple of seats empty. So I contacted my friend Guy Spier, who lives in Zurich. I said, "Hey Guy, I'm going to bid on this lunch, blah blah blah. Do you want to come in with me? If you and your wife want to join us, because there will be four of us and two of you, you can pay one-third, and I'm willing to go up to $2,000,000." Guy says, "Well, that's too rich for me. I can't pay one-third of $2,000,000. I'm good for a quarter million." I said, "Okay, whatever the bid ends up at, you're capped at a quarter million." So I bid for it, and it settled at $650,000—much less than what I was willing to pay. One-third of that got paid by Guy. My only agenda in meeting Warren was to just say, "Thank you, Warren."
01:01:00	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:01:00	Mohnish Pabrai	Right, I didn't have... and of course, he was a big fanboy.
01:01:03	Shaan Puri	Yeah.
01:01:03	Mohnish Pabrai	And you know, meeting him and all that, Warren's agenda when he has these lunches is really different. His agenda is that he wants the people who won that lunch to feel like they got a great bargain. So, he would take all our what I would call our "lemonade lemon questions" and turn them into lemonade. He's always, exactly like I did in the Berkshire meetings, a great teacher. He was trying to give as much value as he could in that lunch. Like he told us when we met him, he said, "Look, I got nothing going on all afternoon. So when you guys are sick and tired of me, you just let me know and I'll leave." We kept asking him questions for three hours, and then we were exhausted. So we said, "Warren, we just don't have anything else to ask you." He said, "Okay, I'll take off, no problem." In that lunch, I told him, "Look, Warren, my wife then, Harina, she's a huge fan of yours, but her true love in life is Charlie." Warren got competitive. He said, "Charlie is a very boring guy. He's a very kind of pessimistic, always says no to everything. I'm the guy who's really interesting." So he said, "What I'm gonna do is you guys live in California, in LA. I'm gonna set you up to meet Charlie for lunch. And then when you meet him for lunch, you're gonna find that he's useless, and I'm the guy." I thought he was joking about that, right? Two days later, I got an email from his assistant to Charlie's assistant, copying us, basically saying, "Hey, I met this wonderful couple in California, and they seem to think you're more interesting. I think they just don't understand, so I want them to meet you so we could set the record straight."
01:02:57	Shaan Puri	This is really what he was saying.
01:02:58	Mohnish Pabrai	This is exactly what he said in the email, right?
01:03:00	Shaan Puri	Was he joking, or was he?
01:03:01	Mohnish Pabrai	Not joking, I... Charlie's assistant sets us up to meet Charlie for lunch. Now, Warren, you can bribe and have lunch with... okay, Charlie, there's no bribing. This is great! So, we met Charlie, my wife and I, in 2008 at the California Club in LA. I actually found that lunch a lot better than the buffet lunch. It was great because I think Charlie is just so direct, you know? I never expected these lunches or any of this to lead to anything, you know? Just a one-and-done. But it led to a friendship with Charlie. He started asking us to come to his place for dinner, and I would meet him like 4 or 5 times a year for dinner. Then we started playing bridge together, usually on Fridays. He would play bridge at the LA Country Club, and I'd meet him about once a month or something to play bridge. That used to be lunch, and then about 4 or 5 hours of bridge after that. So, it was a wonderful, deep friendship for 15 years, which was unexpected. You know, just never expected.
01:04:15	Shaan Puri	So, let's go back to the lunch. You asked him questions for three hours.
01:04:19	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah.
01:04:19	Shaan Puri	What were the interesting questions and answers? I know you've said one that I want to hear you explain because I didn't fully... I've heard the tidbit, but I want to hear the full story. Which was, he said something about being a harsh grader of people. Yes, what does that mean?
01:04:34	Mohnish Pabrai	Well, I told Warren, "You know, both you and Charlie are such good judges of humans and human nature. Were you always that good at figuring people out?" He says to me, "Monash, you're mistaken. I am useless at figuring people out. If you put me in a cocktail party with 100 people and you gave me 5 or 10 minutes to meet each person, I could tell you 3 or 4 people are exceptional, and I could tell you 3 or 4 people you want nothing to do with. The remaining 92, I would have no opinion on because there's not enough time to figure them out." But he also said that what you do in life is focus on those 3 or 4 people who are exceptional. You bring them into your inner circle. Obviously, the 3 or 4 people who are not great humans, you're not going to have anything to do with them. The third thing you do is treat the 92 just like the useless humans and exclude them. He says, "Be a harsh grader." When you have friendships and when you have people you work with—your peers and all that—there's a gravitational pull. If you hang out with people better than you, you're going to get better. If you hang out with people worse than you, you're going to get worse. He said that one of the things that most humans are not willing to do is that loyalties get in the way for them. They may have a friend who's kind of weird or quirky or has ethical issues, but they've had a long friendship, so they'll keep that person around, which has detrimental impacts. I really took that to heart and said that I'm going to try to focus on the great relationships, you know, the great people. That's actually been a journey I've been on now for like 16 or 17 years. It's been tremendous. It's great now, but it's unfair, right? Because you're treating the unknown the same as the useless people. But that's the way life is. Sometimes you have to make these difficult choices because if you don't, the impact of that is significantly negative. One of the things I realized when I started to get to know Charlie is that I got to meet Charlie's friends. I would play bridge with his friends and meet them. What I realized is his friends were so off the charts; they were so exceptional. I said, "Wow, this is like a different world." I decided I'm going to take a shortcut and make Charlie's friends my friends because he's already done all the work.
01:07:52	Shaan Puri	Work. You get the filtering.
01:07:53	Mohnish Pabrai	You can't get a better filter than Charlie Munger, right? So, I worked on building relationships with Charlie's friends and some of his family, and that's been beautiful. I mean, just great friendships. I realized that there's such a huge delta in the off-the-charts top 0.1% and top 1% of humans compared to the rest. We talked about this; Adam Grant wrote this wonderful book, Give and Take, right? He categorizes people into three buckets: the givers, the takers, and the matchers. Now, the takers are people you don't want anything to do with. They're just going to want to extract whatever they can from you, so they're not people you want in your life. The givers are people who are selflessly trying to help the planet, not really concerned about what comes back to them. Those are the ones you want to be with. Then there are the matchers. They're kind of doing math in their heads, like, "Oh, Sean did this for me, so I'm going to do something..."
01:09:02	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:09:02	Mohnish Pabrai	Similar for them, they're kind of... and so even the matchers aren't that great. So what you really want to do is seek out the givers. More important than that, you want to be a giver.
01:09:13	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:09:14	Mohnish Pabrai	And so, the interesting thing that he pointed out in that book is that when you're a giver, the universe conspires to help you. I found it magical how Warren and Charlie are great examples of givers. Everyone's trying to help them in any way they can. The funny thing is that the matchers, who are trying to do this equalization, end up losing. The best way to get the most is to not ask for anything; it'll all come to you.
01:09:48	Shaan Puri	Right, you.
01:09:48	Mohnish Pabrai	These are wonderful models to incorporate.
01:09:52	Shaan Puri	Yeah, there's even some game theory with that. The cost of excluding somebody who might be good or might be great is actually quite low to you. However, the cost of accidentally including somebody who might have some toxicity is quite costly to you. So, you know, I think even in investments, he has the "good" pile and then the "too hard" pile.
01:10:14	Mohnish Pabrai	Warren has a lot of baseball analogies. He says that in investing, there are no called strikes. In baseball, you're at the pitch: three strikes, you're out. He says, "I can let a thousand balls go by, a thousand stocks go by, and not swing."
01:10:28	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:10:29	Mohnish Pabrai	Right, I only need to swing when eight moons line up, right? And so, the fat pitch, right? The thing is that we live in a world with infinite humans. If there are infinite humans, it also implies that there are an infinite number of good humans. So, basically, making an exclusion of a good human from your circle because you can't figure them out... there's no penalty for that, right? Because there's an infinite supply.
01:11:04	Shaan Puri	Right, just...
01:11:04	Mohnish Pabrai	To put as good weight.
01:11:05	Shaan Puri	For the...
01:11:06	Mohnish Pabrai	Mathematically, when you bring in a substandard person, there are just so many drains. It's just negative.
01:11:17	Shaan Puri	I want to hit you with some of your big investing philosophies. Give me the punchy version of what that phrase means and how you use it. So, let's do one: "Heads I win, tails I don't lose much."
01:11:32	Mohnish Pabrai	Well, I mean, I think this classically comes from the Patels, right? The dhandho philosophy. But this is how we want to do all our bets: with people, with stocks, with everything.
01:11:47	Shaan Puri	Asymmetric
01:11:48	Mohnish Pabrai	Where, yeah, basically, we always want to look for things where the odds are so heavily in our favor. In investing, we do get these anomalies where you take what's...
01:12:04	Shaan Puri	One that you've benefited from, or what's an example in your portfolio or career investing where you felt like you recognized asymmetric upside? Your downside was capped, but your upside was high.
01:12:15	Mohnish Pabrai	Well, I mean, I think that if I look at my first business, for example, I am taking $30,000 from my 401(k), which I can make up. At that time, the credit card laws were very different. If you declared personal bankruptcy, you got a clean slate, and it actually didn't affect your credit because you couldn't file again for seven more years. So, everyone would give you money after you filed. Okay, so actually, they've changed the laws now, but at that time, I realized that starting a business has high rates of failure. So, I said, "How do I minimize the risk on that?" This is what all entrepreneurs do. I said, "Okay, so basically, if this thing blows up—which there's some probability that could happen—I got my job already. They want to take me back, and I clean up the slate." I also derisked it because the company was already cash flow positive by the time I quit my job. There was already a pipeline and such. Repeatedly, what I've found is that even in investing, I mean, I'll give you an example. For example, I think in 2003 or 2004, there was a steel company in Canada called IPSCO. I noticed that they were trading for three times earnings. The stock was at $45, they had $15 a share of cash on their balance sheet, they had no debt, and they had contracts over the next couple of years where they had said, "Our earnings for the next two years are going to be $15 a share each year," given that these were not forecasts; these were hard contracts. So, I said, "Okay, the stock's at $45. If I just buy the stock and hold it for two years, I got $45 cash in the company." Now, it was a cyclical business; the third year could be $0 or negative. But I said, "I own all the plant equipment, everything for free." I made the investment and put 10% of my assets into IPSCO. I said, "All I want to do is see what Mr. Market does with this stock in two years. I'm just going to hang out and see what happens." So, we made the investment, and then a year later, the company announced that we were going to have one more year of $15. Okay, so now you're going to have $60 versus $45. By now, the stock has kind of gone up and is sitting at about $90—doubled in one year. I said, "Okay, it's still a very cyclical business; maybe we should take our chips off the table." While I'm thinking about all that, one day I wake up, and the stock's at $155. Some Swedish company came and offered $160 to buy them. Five minutes later, I sold the company and moved on. What I'm saying is that that's what we're looking for. In the equity markets, because these are auction-driven markets, when you look in areas that are hated and unloved, you will find these anomalies. Last year, for example, I spent about seven or eight months studying the coal industry—a four-letter word, hated and unloved more than anything else. A lot of endowments and funds are not even allowed to invest in the coal industry; there's so much hatred for it.
01:15:53	Shaan Puri	So, you got excited.
01:15:54	Mohnish Pabrai	The math was like this: If there's a business that is going to exist for 50 years on average, that's going to produce $1,000,000 a year in cash flow, and that's going to be distributed to shareholders, available to buy for less than $2,000,000,000—where do I sign? Okay, that was a cool industry. So, in auctioned markets, you repeatedly run into these things where, you know, there are companies emerging from bankruptcy. There are things that people just don't like. There are different reasons why things get mispriced.
01:16:41	Shaan Puri	Right, you talked about private markets versus public auctions and why you think public auctions present more of these dislocations, more of these opportunities.
01:16:51	Mohnish Pabrai	Well, I think... let me put it this way. Let's say this home of mine was a publicly traded company, okay? Listed on the NYSE, right? Every day, its price would change. It would be wiggling here and there. If I look at the average public company on the New York Stock Exchange, the 12-month range of the stock might be $70 to $140. If I just throw a dart at any company in the New York Stock Exchange and I look at the 52-week range on that stock price, it's going to be $60 to $100 or $70 to $130.
01:17:37	Shaan Puri	Like a 50% swing.
01:17:38	Mohnish Pabrai	It's a big swing, right? My home, which maybe might go up 4% in a year, or in a good year, maybe 3%, would be vacillating in value. It would sometimes be trading 20-30% more than it's worth and sometimes trading 20-30% less than it's worth. If I had a realtor friend and I said to him, "Listen, can I call you every day and just tell me what my house is worth?" The guy would think I was stupid. But I would call him on Monday and say, "Hey, what's my house worth?" He'd say, "It's worth $2,000,000." I said, "Oh, thank you." I call him the next day, and he said, "Still worth $2,000,000." On the third day, he said, "Listen, idiot, it's $2,000,000." After a month, he would tell me, "Oh, it's moved to $2,030,000." Then again, he would be at $2,030,000 for a while. It won't move because it's an intelligent buyer facing an intelligent seller. So, you're not typically going to get a company like Ipsco available as the whole company for the price you can buy some shares.
01:18:49	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:18:50	Mohnish Pabrai	Because the whole company... there's an intelligent guy. The Swedish company paid four times that price to buy the company, right? And so that's just the nature of the reason I like the public markets. It's because there is so much irrationality. If you're just willing to be patient, you know, in a year, if I can make two good investments, it's a good year. Okay, so we don't need a lot of activity.
01:19:20	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:19:21	Mohnish Pabrai	We just need to be patient and wait for the times when something weird is causing a mispricing.
01:19:31	Shaan Puri	Right, so let me ask you a few questions. Number 1: In your opinion, should somebody just buy a low-cost index fund or actively invest?
01:19:45	Mohnish Pabrai	The index is a really good way to go. The index is too dumb to know that it owns Nvidia, and it's even more dumb that it will never sell Nvidia. For example, it's owned Apple for the last 10 years and never sold it. So, I would say for the overwhelming majority of humans, probably more than 99% of humans, you're best off just buying an index. I think that the U.S. equity markets and the U.S. financial services industry are so efficient that the frictional cost for owning an index through an ETF is, you know, single-digit basis points—less than one-tenth of one percent, less than 0.05% or 1% or so on. So, it's very small, and I think it's very smart to go with indexing. Mhm, absolutely.
01:20:46	Shaan Puri	Yeah, for the vast majority of people.
01:20:48	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, for almost everyone.
01:20:49	Shaan Puri	And for whom shouldn't do that?
01:20:52	Mohnish Pabrai	Well, if you have the talent and the patience to figure out what a business is worth, and then have the ability to buy those businesses well below what they're worth and patiently hold them... those sliver of humans that can do that [are rare].
01:21:11	Shaan Puri	mhmm
01:21:12	Mohnish Pabrai	Would be better off just doing it that way.
01:21:15	Shaan Puri	If I said, "What's the number one trait that makes a great investor?" what comes to mind? Patience.
01:21:22	Mohnish Pabrai	If you are a guy who loves to watch paint dry, you know, you paint a wall and just sit there and watch it dry. You will do very well. Did you ever watch Seinfeld?
01:21:34	Shaan Puri	Some episode.
01:21:34	Mohnish Pabrai	Not, not, not religiously. The thing is that Elaine is on a flight with her boyfriend. Okay, I forget the name of the boyfriend. I think if you pull up Google, you can probably find this clip. The boyfriend is just staring at the seat back in front of him. Elaine says to him, "Would you like something to read?" He keeps looking at the seat back and says, "No. Do you want to talk about something?" He says, "No." He's just doing nothing; he's just looking at the seat back in front of him. By the end of the flight, she's broken up with him.
01:22:14	Shaan Puri	Yes.
01:22:18	Mohnish Pabrai	He would have made a great investor.
01:22:23	Shaan Puri	That's what you need.
01:22:25	Mohnish Pabrai	You can be happy or, like, you know, Pascal... Pascal had a great quote. He says that "all man's miseries stem from his inability to sit quietly in a room alone and do nothing."
01:22:37	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:22:38	Mohnish Pabrai	Right, and so if you have this ability to watch paint dry or watch the back of an airplane seat for a few hours and just be in a nirvana state, this is the work you need to be doing.
01:22:50	Shaan Puri	I don't know if you know this, but you have fans in a subreddit on Reddit. I don't know if you have ever been on it.
01:22:56	Mohnish Pabrai	I haven't done much on Reddit, no.
01:22:57	Shaan Puri	So, I went, and when I was doing my research for this, I was seeing what do people think about you? What questions do people have? One of the best comments that I thought was such a great compliment was, "The day I knew that this is my guy I want to follow, he's on CNBC, he's on a TV show, and they're asking for stock picks." So, they give a stock pick, and they go around the corner. Everybody gives their stock; it's going to be this, it's going to be that, this is going to go up. Then they go to you, and you say, "I don't really give public stock tips like this." They're like, "Well, you're on TV; you gotta do something." The comment was, "He refused to just randomly name a pick or tell people to go buy something." The TV hosts were like, "Why are you on TV?" And you were like, "That's not what I do." Then you just stayed steadfast. I thought it was such a great compliment, but also a big contrast from watching Kramer or these guys. It's like you go on, and it's overstimulation, telling you, "You gotta do something right now." The opposite of patience, basically. Should people avoid that?
01:23:58	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, I mean, I think that it's a big red flag if you're taking stock tips from some guy on TV. I think that's just not going to end well. You know, the guy on TV is not going to be there when you're down 30%. Right? He's off somewhere, not available.
01:24:11	Shaan Puri	Have you seen the reverse Cramer index? It's not just him. Yeah, people just... whatever he said, do the exact opposite, and you're up. Like, you're crushing the market if you just did the exact opposite of this guy.
01:24:21	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, so I mean, I think that, like I said, indexing is a great way to go for most people. I wish, in high school, or even middle school, compounding was part of the curriculum from an investing point of view. It's really simple, but people don't pay attention to the math. There are three variables that matter with compounding. One is the starting capital you have, the second is the annualized rate of return you get, and the third is the length of the runway. Now, there's something known as the Rule of 72, which is a kind of mathematical...
01:25:09	Shaan Puri	Very helpful rule. Explain it.
01:25:10	Mohnish Pabrai	It's...
01:25:10	Shaan Puri	A beautiful lesson I learned was from one teacher in college. She used to be a student and came back to teach because she said, "I wish we actually taught things that were relevant in the real world." So, she took it upon herself to become a teacher and teach personal finance. The one thing she emphasized was, "You know, compounding is the 8th wonder of the world." Let me just tell you about the Rule of 72; it's very simple math.
01:25:30	Mohnish Pabrai	The Rule of 72 is just a mathematical quirk that happens to work. For example, if I'm getting a 7% return a year and I want to know how long it's going to take for this money to double, I can take 72 divided by 7. It's approximately 10.
01:25:46	Shaan Puri	10 years ago.
01:25:47	Mohnish Pabrai	10 years, right? If I have a 10% interest rate that I'm getting, and again, if I do 72 divided by 10, it's 7 years. So, you can switch between the years or the interest rate, and it tells you the other one.
01:26:01	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:26:01	Mohnish Pabrai	And this is the most important thing in life: how long does something take to double? Okay, because that basically leads to everything else. For example, if you look at someone like Warren Buffett, right? He started his compounding journey when he was like 10 or 11 years old. I think he would say it was when he was 7 years old. He's going to be 94 this year. Okay, that's an 87-year runway so far. Now, the thing is that if you have a really long runway, then a low rate of compounding would still get you a big number. Or if you have a shorter runway and a higher rate, it would again get you the same result. So, it's very important in life. That's why I think that I wish they'd do this in high school: to start that engine early. So, for example, let's take a situation of someone who's just finished college, right? At 22 years old, they got some job, maybe making like $70,000 or $80,000 a year or something, and they put away $10,000 in their 401(k). Right? They're 22 years old in an index. That index has done 10% a year. Now, what that means is the 10% a year means that that $10,000 will double every 7 years. So, let's take a situation where the person is now 64 years old. Right? Now, they started at 22, it's 64, so it's 42 years. 42 years is 6 doubles. I do this to make it easy, right? Okay, so 6 doubles, right? That's 2 to the power of 6. 2 to the power of 6 is 64. So, that $10,000 that the person saved at 22 is $640,000 at 64. But that's not all they have. At 23, they save $11,000. That's again sitting at some big number, and you keep going. Sometimes we see these news articles about some guy who's a janitor at some college, and he gives $4,000,000 to the college and lived in a one-bedroom apartment, whatever. Right? Why are we surprised? Okay, if you actually run the math, he actually didn't even save that much, and he didn't even have such a great compounding engine. It's not like he found Apple 20 years ago or something. That's not what happened. What happened was that there was consistency. So, actually, my pushback to my dad when he was telling me to start a business was that I was telling him at that time, I said, "Look, I got a 401(k). I got $30,000 in the 401(k), right? I'm continuing with 15% a year." My employer at that time was matching the first 2%, so it was becoming 17% tax-free, basically. It's tax-deferred, and my income's going up over time. So, when I first started working, my salary was $31,000, right? So, I'm saving $4,500 a year. But if I was still working, my pay would have been $100,000 or more. And I'm putting away a lot of money. So, by the time I get to retirement, it's like it's game over. You know, lots of extra cash available, no problem. And I never missed the money because it was pretax.
01:29:50	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:29:50	Mohnish Pabrai	It's just great. I think I wish that young people understand that, yes, listen, you can pursue lottery tickets, you can pursue entrepreneurial dreams, you can do all of that. That's fine. But on the side, keep this going.
01:30:08	Shaan Puri	And just start it early.
01:30:10	Mohnish Pabrai	Let it be boring. Let it be a stupid index fund, Vanguard, and whatever. And that's it. The tortoise is gonna win the race.
01:30:20	Shaan Puri	Right. You know, what's the "circle the wagons" philosophy?
01:30:24	Mohnish Pabrai	Well, the "circle the wagons" philosophy actually came out of when I was thinking about Buffett's letter last year to shareholders. In the 2023 letter, he pointed out that in 58 years of running Berkshire, there were only 12 decisions that he had made that had moved the needle for Berkshire. Now, Berkshire has had a tremendous run. They've compounded, I mean, until recently, we're compounding at over 20% a year for 58 years. That's, you know, if you're doing 20% a year, you are doubling every three and a half years. Okay, and that means after 35 years, it's 10 doubles. And 58 is another 23 years, so you've got another, what, 16 doubles? Two to the power of 16. Now, the way to do two to the power of 16 is two to the power of 10 times two to the power of 6. Two to the power of 10, round numbers, is 1,000. It's a 1,000x, right? And two to the power of 6 is 64. So, it's 64,000 times what you started with. Okay, if you started with $100, it's $6,400,000. Okay, $100 to $6,400,000. So, he's saying I would calculate in the last 58 years, Buffett's made 300 or 400, at least 400 different investment decisions. He's saying 12 are the ones that mattered. Right? The god of investing has a 4% hit rate. That's the god of investing. That's why we should index.
01:32:11	Shaan Puri	Right, what are the rest of us mere mortals supposed to do?
01:32:14	Mohnish Pabrai	So now the thing is that I was thinking about his 12 bets, right? I thought about, okay, which were the 12? I think he never mentioned that, but you could guess which ones. Coke would be one of them. Amex, Gillette, Cap Cities, Washington Post... you know, you can come up with the names. You know, Berkshire Hathaway, Energy, Ajit Jain... hiding Ajit Jain is probably the biggest bet for them, but it paid off huge for them.
01:32:39	Shaan Puri	What's the story with Ajit? There's something about the recruiter for him.
01:32:43	Mohnish Pabrai	So, what I realized when I thought about these 12 bets was that it wasn't the buy decision. The buy decision is important, but the important thing was they never sold. They stayed in the stable for 50 years. Coke has been in the stable for 40+ years, right? So, it wasn't the buy decision; it was the "paint drying" decision. Okay, that was the important thing. So, when you find yourself in the happy position of having a small ownership in a great business, just find something else to do with your time. Play bridge or whatever, right?
01:33:25	Shaan Puri	Have you considered golf? I have.
01:33:28	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, golf is great. If you ask Charlie, he would say the single best decision, the best investment Berkshire Hathaway ever made was the search fee they paid to hire Ajit Jain. Now, Ajit Jain walked into their offices in 1985, never having worked in the insurance business, right from scratch, without them putting up venture capital or anything. The business he's created for them today probably has a value north of $100 billion. It just gets lost in Berkshire, where Berkshire is so big. I'll give you an example of a discussion I had with Charlie, I think it was maybe 2 or 3 months before he passed away. He was telling me that Berkshire Hathaway writes super catastrophe insurance, like insurance against hurricanes, earthquakes, and so on. Many years ago, when people were looking for earthquake insurance in Florida or hurricane insurance in Florida, Ajit would look at the rates being offered and just take a pass. Basically, he would find it too competitive or that people were not giving enough. What he did in 2023, and they mentioned it at the meeting, is that he wrote hurricane insurance on Berkshire's behalf, reinsurance with a maximum payout of $15 billion. So, if these hurricanes had hit, now basically the math is like this: I just want to explain how Ajit's mind works. Berkshire would pay out on a big catastrophe, like an earthquake or hurricanes, 3 to 5% of the total insured loss incurred. For them to have a $15 billion payout, you would have to have had an event with insured losses in Florida of $300 billion. It's beyond Andrew and beyond Katrina.
01:35:55	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:35:55	Mohnish Pabrai	It's beyond all of those, right? So, it'll need to be a really big event for them to have a $15,000,000,000 payout. The premium he collected to write that $15,000,000,000 policy... take a guess. Take a guess. $5,000,000,000. He collected $5,000,000,000. Oh, okay, and I...
01:36:14	Shaan Puri	Was sweating, I guess.
01:36:15	Mohnish Pabrai	No, no, but he collected. That's exactly what he collected. How much did he pay out in '23?
01:36:21	Shaan Puri	0
01:36:22	Mohnish Pabrai	There was one that came through. My guess would be they might have paid out $300,000,000.
01:36:26	Shaan Puri	Okay.
01:36:27	Mohnish Pabrai	You know, some 300 million.
01:36:28	Shaan Puri	5,000,000,000
01:36:29	Mohnish Pabrai	And what Charlie said to me is, "Ajit has done this about 6 times." Okay, where he's picked the years that he's written this policy. Because what was happening in most years is the premium offered was $2,000,000,000. He just took a pass.
01:36:46	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:36:47	Mohnish Pabrai	Right. A lot of all the other insurers wrote that policy. Berkshire took a pass.
01:36:52	Shaan Puri	Right, no called strikes.
01:36:53	Mohnish Pabrai	Right, and now, for example, we've had some unusual losses. Like, for instance, that ship in Baltimore right now. That's going to end up being about $3.3 to $5 billion in losses. It's the biggest maritime loss in global history. It's going to change premiums for ships in the future. Berkshire will probably be writing when everyone else is saying, "I don't want to do that." You know, it's like the cat who sat on a hot stove and doesn't want to sit on any hot or cold stoves ever again.
01:37:35	Shaan Puri	You have a thing over there. I saw in your office that says, it's like a placard, it says, "Trouble is opportunity."
01:37:40	Mohnish Pabrai	Absolutely, that's a quote.
01:37:42	Shaan Puri	The story of that.
01:37:42	Mohnish Pabrai	It's a quote by John Templeton. Actually, a good friend of mine, Prem Watsa, in Canada, as we call him the Berkshire Hathaway of Canada, or "Warren Buffett of Canada." I had seen that plaque on his desk, and somebody sent it to me. It's a great quote. I mean, I think that that's what we are trying to do with investors. We need to be fearful when the world is greedy, and we need to be greedy when the world is fearful. So basically, when the world is running away from coal, we need to run towards coal. I'm always looking at what is hated and unloved. Usually, you will get a lot of mispricing when something is hated and unloved.
01:38:33	Shaan Puri	Right, tell me about Bitcoin. Are you a fan of crypto? Bitcoin, are you a believer?
01:38:38	Mohnish Pabrai	Outside my circle of competence, and I would say that if you put a gun to my head, I would say it's going to end badly.
01:38:44	Shaan Puri	Hmm... and why is that?
01:38:47	Mohnish Pabrai	It's in the eye of the beholder. There is no intrinsic value, as I understand it, to Bitcoin. Now, you can argue that there isn't an intrinsic value to the dollar, but it has the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, which is then backed by the hardworking American people. So basically, I think that for me, it's in the "too hard" pile. But I think for most people, I would just say, "take a pass."
01:39:20	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:39:20	Mohnish Pabrai	Most people who have invested in Bitcoin couldn't really tell you why it's valuable or what it's going to be worth, and why it should be worth that.
01:39:34	Shaan Puri	Okay, fair enough. One of the reasons I wanted to fly here is because it's fun to meet these kind of outlier investors or even just hear their stories. I've heard you tell a couple of stories about guys I've never heard of, and I would love for you to share those stories because I think most people have never heard of these individuals. So, tell me about Nick Sleep. Who is Nick Sleep? Or Jinja Noella, whichever is your favorite. Give me one of the stories that...
01:40:00	Mohnish Pabrai	You love... I think Nick is a wonderful guy. There's a book called Richer, Wiser, Happier that came out maybe 2 or 3 years ago, and there's a chapter on him. Nick is very... he's a recluse; he doesn't do interviews and such. I was actually surprised he even talked to the author, but it's worth reading the book. You know him. He and his partner, Zach, would come into their office and basically just sit and read annual report after annual report until they were blue in the face. I mean, they were just... they wanted to see if they could understand different businesses. That exercise of reading those annual reports led them to the annual report of Amazon. For example, I've been a customer of Amazon and known Amazon for a long time, etc. I'm familiar with the business, but every time I would take a cursory glance at Amazon, it looked very expensive on an earnings basis or P/E basis. It looked really expensive. The reason it looked expensive is they were investing so far ahead of the curve on growth that what should have been categorized as capital expenditures (CapEx) was just categorized as expenses. So, the U.S. government was really funding their growth because there were no taxes being collected. Now, what Nick and Zach were able to do, because they were just sitting in their office with no distractions, was read year after year of Buffett's and Bezos' letters. The Bezos letters are worth reading. I mean, I think they're very clear. He clearly laid out in those letters what he was up to. He wasn't completely candid, but you could tell that the business had very high returns on capital. He was investing; he was throwing a lot of things against the wall, but basically, they were very low-risk bets. If any single bet didn't work, it wouldn't sink the company. For example, one of the bets they made was AWS, which became huge. They didn't know it was going to become as big as it did, but they also made a bet on Amazon Fire, which didn't work. What Nick and Zach realized is that here was a very gifted capital allocator who understood all the different facets of building a team and going after different markets. He actually disrupted multiple industries. So, they had placed a bet on Amazon, and because Amazon was doing so well, it was becoming a larger and larger portion of their fund. In the UK, there are more regulations on hedge funds than we have in the U.S. The UK regulator was telling them that they saw this position as very high risk and that they needed to diversify. They were getting pressure, but they felt that they understood the business so well. So, they looked at each other. They were managing, I think, $2 or $3 billion. They had made $100 million for each of them, and they said, "Look, we are independently wealthy. We never thought we'd be here. We're young. Why do we have to listen to some regulator?" They could return all the capital to all their investors. What Nick said is, "If I return the capital, I'm going to put everything into 3 stocks." These are 3 stocks he owned; maybe a dozen stocks, but he was going to go into 3 stocks. The 3 stocks he was going to put one-third each into were one-third Berkshire, one-third Amazon, and one-third Costco. He said, "I'm very comfortable with these 3 stocks. They're built to last businesses." He did that, and what happened a few years after they hung up their boots is... it's really funny. Amazon still kept going; it's a juggernaut. It became 70-80% of the pie. So instead of them being one-third each, it was 80-10-10, for example. Nick decided that, "Oh, maybe I should take some chips off the table here." So, he cut the Amazon position in half and bought another business, which has not done well; it went sideways. And that goes back to Buffett's...
01:45:05	Mohnish Pabrai	Of 12 that worked in 58 years, we are not going to... If Warren Buffett has a 4% hit rate, the rest of us are going to have a 2% hit rate, okay? But you also need to get rich just once. So, I think that what worked really well for Nick and Zach was they took the Buffett lesson, which is that once you have a great business, just leave it alone. Now, even after he was sloppy and he took chips off the table from 80% or whatever, he still has done very well.
01:45:40	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:45:41	Mohnish Pabrai	And I think one of the things that investors forget is that if you look at the Walton family, none of them are running Walmart. Sam Walton passed away a long time ago; it's been several decades since he passed away. The Waltons have, for the most part, kept the Walmart stock, and for most of them, it's almost their entire net worth in a single stock, right? So, it's more concentrated than even mixed sleepers. It's not a business that they control, it's not a business that they run, and it's not a business that they are on the board of. None of them gives them sleepless nights, right? For example, in 2018, I started visiting Turkey. I was just looking at things that were hated and unloved at that time. I saw that the Turkish markets were screening really cheap. Everyone and their brother was just exiting Turkey. I have a really good friend of mine in Istanbul, a very good investor, kind of a classic Ben Graham investor. I told him, "Hey Haider, I'd love to visit Istanbul, and I'd love to visit all the companies in your portfolio, starting with the company with your strongest conviction, your biggest position, to the smallest position." I said, "Don't take me to see any companies where you don't have money."
01:47:16	Shaan Puri	In
01:47:17	Mohnish Pabrai	Okay, he said, "Mona, it should be a blast." So, I went to Istanbul for the first time in 2018. The Blue Fish on the Bosphorus was great, and all these different businesses we saw were great too. You know, I didn't really do much work. He told me what places we were going to, but I just said, "Let me meet the companies first." I went back in 2019, and as we were driving to this company, I said, "Haider, remind me what company we are going to. What's the cliff notes version?" He said, "Okay, this company we're going to visit, Resas, has a $16,000,000 market cap." He continued, "The liquidation value of the business, if you sold it today, is $800,000,000." I asked, "Is it a fraud?" He replied, "No, I'm invested in the company." So, I said, "You're telling me the company is trading for 2% of its liquidation value?" He said, "Yeah." I asked, "Why?" He said, "It's Turkey; you know everything's cheap." I responded, "But this is outlier cheap." Resas is basically a very simple business. They are the largest warehouse operator in Turkey. They rent out all these warehouses, which are 99% leased, inflation-indexed, and leased to blue-chip clients like Amazon, IKEA, Carrefour, Mercedes, and Toyota. I went and met the father and son who run the company, the founders, and then I visited a bunch of the warehouses. I couldn't find anything wrong with it. He was absolutely right. If you just went to any realtor in Turkey and said, "This is their 80 warehouses; give me a value for each one," he would just look at the rent and tell you, "Okay, you're looking at about $70 to $80 a square foot for each warehouse." They had 12,000,000 square feet, which was about $1,000,000,000, and there was $200,000,000 of debt. So, with an $800,000,000 liquidation value and a $16,000,000 market cap, I thought, "Okay, this thing probably trades by appointment, and maybe I can't buy the stock." But Turkey has very high trading volume because they're all gamblers. I found that when I started buying the stock, huge volumes were available. I spent $8,000,000 to get a third of the company. Now, the way I look at it is that when you look at Buffett's letter with the 12 positions or you look at Nick Sleep with Amazon, the family that runs the business has maybe 40-45% ownership. I'm an outside investor at 33%. I have no board seat, but the way I look at Resas is the way the Walton family looks at Walmart stock. What I've noticed since then, since 2019, is they have increased the value of that business. I would say that probably today, the business might be worth $1.5 to $2,000,000,000, somewhere in that range. I think they'll continue to grow because I've never seen them make any stupid decisions. They're very smart about their decisions; it's very well run. So, I say, "Okay, basically we are done. We will keep that business. I don't care about the stock price." The $16,000,000 market cap now is about $500,000,000. You know, the Turkish lira, which when we were investing was 5 lira to the dollar, today is approaching 33 lira to the dollar. The Turkish lira has collapsed, and in dollars, we're up almost 30x.
01:51:45	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:51:45	Mohnish Pabrai	Right, but the business is worth more.
01:51:50	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:51:50	Mohnish Pabrai	And so, the thing is that it's exactly what Buffett says: basically, just leave it alone. As long as that family and that father and son are running the business, we will just keep our stake and let it keep running. So, basically, the idea is that when I look back, I'm going to find there were a few things that moved the needle big time. The rest... and the key to moving the needle is inactivity. So, that's what you gotta be. You gotta be very patient and be very inactive.
01:52:32	Shaan Puri	Right, you talked about Bezos being a capital allocator. Buffett, obviously, is a capital allocator for Berkshire. What, you know, who are the other... I guess if I just throw some names at you or some companies at you, I'm curious to hear your take on how well they allocate capital. Because we know how maybe good their brand is or their product is. But we were talking about this yesterday. There's a transition from being a product manager, where your focus is building product, to being a people manager, where you're building an organization, and then to being a money manager. Now, you're sitting on $100,000,000,000, and you have to figure out some way to invest it. So, tell me about Meta or Facebook. What do you think? How do you think they've done with capital allocation?
01:53:16	Mohnish Pabrai	Well, I think it was really surprising to see how he did a 180. I mean, I think Mark basically moved from being a spendthrift to being a Patel, you know? He... I mean, literally, I just can't... I think it was remarkable to see an entrepreneur pivot that way.
01:53:41	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:53:41	Mohnish Pabrai	So, you know, Meta was like a country club. They had all this spending going on in various areas, and he really tightened it up. I mean, it showed up in the numbers. Mhm. I mean, Facebook is a great business. All the different brands and properties they have are tremendous. It is the norm in capitalism that great businesses will be sloppy with how they execute. I think it's very rare to find a great business that is also tight-fisted. Meta wasn't tight-fisted, but it is now, and that was just wonderful to see. So, I think the capital allocation there is excellent now, right?
01:54:30	Shaan Puri	What do you think about Elon Musk, fellow Texas resident?
01:54:36	Mohnish Pabrai	The United States... this is one of the most beautiful things about the United States: Elon wasn't born here. He wasn't educated in his first 20 years of life over here. We, the United States, got a finished product, basically. He's created tremendous value, tremendous jobs, and disrupted multiple industries. I think Elon is an exceptional allocator of capital. Yeah, it's terrific, actually.
01:55:10	Shaan Puri	And Tesla gets a lot of conversation. Is Tesla overvalued? Is it undervalued? Is it, you know, too frothy? I guess what's your take on it? When you look at a business like Tesla, how does your mind analyze a business like Tesla?
01:55:23	Mohnish Pabrai	It would go into the "too hard" pile. I would say this: Elon is not human. Okay, he's beyond human. If you just think about all the things he's done, I mean, now that Neuralink, and the Boring Company, and what he's doing with SpaceX, it's just really very remarkable. The execution is off the charts. I think, like I said, it's just unbelievable in terms of what he's been able to accomplish. So, I have a lot of respect for him. I think Elon understands capital allocation really well. All the businesses that he gets involved with or found do so well because he gets so much out of the people, which basically means he gets so much out of the capital. I mean, his hiring is so good. The teams that he's building are so exceptional that, when you're hiring a software engineer, there could be an engineer who's worth $10 million a year, and there could be another guy worth $100,000 a year, and he can tell the difference.
01:56:42	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:56:42	Mohnish Pabrai	And so, that's a great skill to have.
01:56:45	Shaan Puri	Yeah, I love that. We'll end with this. We have Charlie, you know, here, and he passed away. You were friends with him. What's maybe your favorite story or lesson from Charlie Munger?
01:56:56	Mohnish Pabrai	Yeah, I mean, I obviously miss Charlie. I think he was one of a kind. I've been thinking over the last several weeks and months about so many of the lessons and things he taught. One of the things Charlie said in one of the last interviews he gave was when someone asked him, "What would you like on your gravestone?" He replied, "I tried to be useful." I think those words, "I tried to be useful," encapsulate Charlie really well. If you look at Warren Buffett's tribute to him that he did this year in the letter, Charlie selflessly helped Warren a lot. I mean, without Charlie Munger, there's no Berkshire Hathaway, even though you had Warren Buffett there. Twice, I went to Charlie when I was facing difficult personal situations—nothing related to investing. He was extremely helpful to me. I just did exactly what he told me to do, and those issues disappeared. Charlie always tried to see how he could help the world in all the institutions that he touched. His memorial was at the Harvard Westlake School in California, and he transformed that institution. He was on the board of the Good Sam Doss Hospital and transformed the hospital as well. At Berkshire Hathaway, he transformed many partnerships. He always gave them the better deal. In every way possible, I think that was absolutely correct. He selflessly tried to be useful. You know, I don't think Charlie believed in God or religion. I think he didn't believe in legacy. He believed that when we're gone, we're gone—it's ashes and dust. Right up until one day before he passed away, he was in the hospital. He knew he was dying, yet he was trying to get one last grant done to a nonprofit. There was no upside to him; he was dying.
01:59:20	Shaan Puri	Right.
01:59:21	Mohnish Pabrai	Right, six days... six days before he passed away, he was buying a stock. Okay, you know, a stock we discussed, and I’d sent him a write-up on. So, I’m just saying that I think Charlie extracted everything he could from his mind and his body. The other thing was that he never complained. He lost sight in one eye many decades ago and was almost blind in the other eye. He cared most about reading; that was most important to him. I saw him one time when the second eye was giving him a very serious problem where he could have gone blind. This was maybe ten years ago. Even when he was facing the prospect of complete blindness, he was so stoic. He never said, "Oh, poor me," or showed self-pity. His response to me was, "I'm gonna have to learn Braille." You know, that’s how he was going to deal with it. So, I think, yeah, it’s great. We have such a big, rich body of work that he left—Poor Charlie's Almanack—and I think there’s a lot to learn from him.
02:00:39	Shaan Puri	Right, well, thank you for sharing that. And thank you for doing this. This is hopefully your process of sharing some of your wisdom, so thank you for doing it.
02:00:47	Mohnish Pabrai	This was a pleasure. I really enjoyed the session. Thank you.
02:00:50	Shaan Puri	Right on. Okay.
02:00:52	Mohnish Pabrai	Alright, sounds good. Thank you.

Discover

Listen

Catalog

Connect

Turning $1M Into $1B+: A Masterclass From The Indian Warren Buffett | Mohnish Pabrai Interview

Transcript: