Expert Colleague Vetting

Andrew Huberman describes his rigorous process for creating scientifically accurate content while maintaining credibility and accessibility.

Core Content Creation Process

• Consults with 2-3 expert colleagues before creating specialized content
• Uses an informal "advisory board" of scientific experts
• Maintains narrow, focused messaging
• Ensures information is properly vetted before publication
• Acknowledges limitations by consulting experts in areas outside his expertise

Content Distribution Philosophy

• Provides zero-cost access to scientific information
• Deliberately avoids putting content behind paywalls
• Accepts some advertising but limits affiliate partnerships
• Focuses on building trust through vetted, accessible information
• Prioritizes global accessibility over maximum monetization

Quality Control Measures

• Reviews content with professional experts in specific fields
• Particularly careful with topics outside personal expertise (e.g., ADHD)
• Leverages scientific community connections for accuracy
• Creates ecosystem between:
  • Academia
  • Public health
  • Science communication
  • Private sector

Mission and Values

• Commitment to providing trusted source for science, health, and fitness information
• Acknowledges not everything will be perfect but strives for accuracy
• Maintains academic involvement while doing public communication
• Values academic discourse for its methodical approach to finding answers
• Prioritizes information accessibility over profit maximization