Bitcoin Creator's Strategic Anonymity

Shaan Puri believes the most likely creator of Bitcoin is Hal Finney, and that the creator's anonymity was intentionally maintained to ensure Bitcoin's success. He argues that removing the creator from the equation was essential for the cryptocurrency to thrive without centralized control or criticism.

Key Points:

• Evidence Supporting Hal Finney Theory:

  • Received the first Bitcoin transaction
  • Was active in early Bitcoin forums
  • His death timeline coincides with Satoshi's last known posts
  • Was a cryptographer with relevant expertise

• Creator's Anonymity Strategy:

  • Used pseudonym "Satoshi Nakamoto" deliberately sacrificing personal recognition
  • "Parent dies so the child can survive" philosophy
  • Preventing centralized control criticism
  • Avoiding claims of too much power or ulterior motives

• Proof of Ownership:

  • No coins have ever moved from Satoshi's wallet
  • Could prove ownership by signing with Satoshi's wallet
  • Lack of movement suggests either:
    • Creator is deceased
    • Intentionally keeping coins locked
    • Possible time-delayed instructions to family

• Strategic Reasons for Coin Immobility:

  • Moving coins could harm Bitcoin's stability
  • Would trigger market sell-off
  • Would create unwanted drama and speculation
  • Could damage the project's credibility

• Contrast with Craig Wright Claims:

  • Could easily prove ownership but doesn't
  • Vitalik Buterin publicly criticized these claims
  • Simple proof method exists but isn't used
  • Community generally rejects his claims